‘Nasty Nan’: Why voters fired Hayworth

11/10/2012
By
Nan Hayworth

Rep. Nan Hayworth

The Cook Political Report dismissed New York’s new 18th Congressional District as “Leans Republican.” Polls showed the well-financed incumbent with a comfortable lead, and the openly gay challenger came from outside the district…from Manhattan yet. Political oracles didn’t even think this was a race worth watching. But Republican Nan Hayworth managed to wash out, losing to Democrat Sean Patrick Maloney. And it wasn’t even close.

Maloney ran a fantastic campaign, with a young, enthusiastic staff, a targeted ground game, grassroots support, and the campaigning help of President Bill Clinton. But Maloney had a lot of hurdles to overcome: He was a late-comer and faced four other Democrats in a primary, and those grassroots groups, who later backed him, fought him tooth-and-nail in that race. He was a political insider and a district outsider. Last, his associations with the scandal-plagued administrations of three Democrats, former Governors Eliot Spitzer and David Paterson, and President Clinton, were obvious sore points.

And then the question of lifestyle: While being a LGBT politician in Manhattan would elicit just yawns, this Hudson Valley district includes some socially-conservative enclaves. Rivals thankfully didn’t make it an issue during the primary and general elections, but some Maloney supporters quietly acknowledged this as a possible negative factor.

While Maloney entered this race with many encumbrances, Nan Hayworth had a wealth of political capital to spend, and she managed to squander every red cent of it. Her two years in Congress serve as an example of how not to serve. Reciting the list of gaffes, flip-flops, hypocrisy, and general malignancy could fill a book; and sometimes it seemed news of Hayworth’s political malpractice was cribbed from The Onion.

Hayworth’s first faux pas came more than two years ago, while she was challenging John Hall for the 19th Congressional District seat. She aligned herself with Tea-Party thugs, notably the Tri-State Sons of Liberty, a group of “tough guys” and their acolytes that infused avarice into the 2010 election. And while the Tea Party might have been fashionable two years ago and politically convenient for Hayworth, they have become a running joke and their leaders exposed as nothing more than conspiracy theorists, racists, and punks. Notably, these groups are disappearing; the Tri-State Sons of Liberty’s website, which served mostly as a campaign arm for Hayworth in 2010, has been dormant for more than a year.

Once in Congress, Hayworth shed her Tea Party skin and joined the collective hiss of the Republican leadership, notably slithering with House Majority Leader Eric Cantor. She coiled in the safety of the GOP den, and joined them into springing out against the best interests of her district. If she wasn’t trying to stop government-backed loans for district businesses and killing real jobs, she was demanding that Congress withhold federal disaster aid to her constituents battered by Hurricane Irene unless offsetting budget cuts were made elsewhere.  Hayworth held hostage the families, farmers, and businesses in the district until Democrats met her demands. This alienated those of all political stripes and compromised Hayworth’s relationship with small businesses and farmers.

Hayworth didn’t help her situation when she began to repeatedly snub her constituents. On a few notable occasions, she  locked the doors or restricted access to her Congressional district offices when she feared she would be confronted by residents she didn’t agree with. Her staff also shamelessly and repeatedly deleted comments from her Congressional Facebook page that weren’t to their  liking, actions that showed cowardice and antipathy toward her general constituency.

Then there was her campaign’s two misogynistic scandals, both of which became widely covered news stories, which she handled poorly. The more notable of the two scandals involved her campaign spokesperson, Jay Townsend, who suggested that Republicans “hurl some acid” in the faces of female Democratic lawmakers, echoing an abominable act often used by the Taliban to terrorize women into submission. Hayworth was profoundly snail-like despite repeated calls for her to act. Ultimately, she never apologized for Townsend’s remarks; she only curtly accepted his resignation and scolded her critics after many days.

Fresh on the heels of that scandal, critics resurrected a 2003 report involving Hayworth’s campaign manager, Karl Brabenec (also the Town Supervisor of Deerpark, NY). He once distributed flyers for his “Karlpalooza” party to Young Republicans. He promised “liquor and sex to go around all evening” and encouraged young women to “wear as little clothing as possible.” Hayworth ignored this revelation.

Those controversies came at a time when Hayworth joined with her fellow Republicans in legislating against reproductive choice and contraception, and they put an exclamation point behind assertions that she was a traitor to her gender in the “War on Women.”

Meanwhile, Hayworth tried to “Etch-A-Sketch” herself as a moderate. And like Mitt Romney, her flip was a huge flop. Eyes collectively rolled when she began to try to secure moderate support by bragging to the media that she often votes with President Obama.

As noted earlier, the list of grievances against Hayworth’s service is extensive, but those presented in this article are enough to paint a picture of an extraordinarily flawed legislator. And now it is time to bring up the 800-pound gorilla in the room: Hayworth’s conspicuous wealth.

Let’s be honest with ourselves, Hayworth’s millions was a handicap the day she was elected. But it was incumbent on her to prove that she could connect with those of more moderate means. And while some of us may look at the wealthy with a jaundiced eye or envy, it only takes a bit of compassion,  humility, and philanthropy for them to become heroes to all; only the deluded and bitter have negative perceptions of Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Michael Bloomberg, or Oprah Winfrey.

While constituents saw Hayworth’s aloofness, pride, and animus toward them, they married it to her notable wealth.  Her myopic focus on additional tax cuts for the rich did not help her case. Eventually, Hayworth’s ultimate undoing was her image problem. The perception was that she served mammon more than she did mankind. She became a modern-day Marie Antoinette, Imelda Marcos, or Leona Helmsley.

The last nail in Hayworth’s political coffin came not long before the November election, when she railed against increasing the minimum wage, but told a local political group that she believed the nation’s base wage was ”$10 to $11 an hour,” missing the mark by about 40 percent. The real minimum wage is $7.25 an hour.

In the end, Hayworth’s greed and indifference toward struggling families, farms, and businesses became the political equivalent of Jacob Marley’s chains. And each time she demonstrated this contempt, another link emerged until the weight made it impossible to compete in the race.

  • http://www.facebook.com/peg.jeffries320 Peg Jeffries

    I didn’t vote for “Nan” because, although I had heard of her, I didn’t realize that she represented me (or not so much, maybe) until the ads for the elections pointed out that very fact. I figured she hadn’t touched my life so far, so I might as well try the other guy. Sad, huh?

  • http://www.facebook.com/peg.jeffries320 Peg Jeffries

    I didn’t vote for “Nan” because, although I had heard of her, I didn’t realize that she represented me (or not so much, maybe) until the ads for the elections pointed out that very fact. I figured she hadn’t touched my life so far, so I might as well try the other guy. Sad, huh?

  • Marc

    Now…can we get her campaign lackeys to pick up the million signs she littered throughout the district?

  • Jahngra

    I love this line: “they have become a running joke and their leaders exposed as nothing more than conspiracy theorists, racists, and punks.”

  • Greco

    She lost this Republican farmer from Orange County and most my friends, too as I’m pretty darn persuasive. What the writer pointed about her response to last summer’s tropical storm was spot on. We were left to fend for ourselves while she played chicken with the Senate and the President. I don’t care what side of the aisle you’re on, but you better be on my side when I need you. I hope she retires from politics permanently, it was a bad career move for all of us.

  • http://www.facebook.com/christopher.pawelski Christopher Pawelski

    Once again, excellent article Cliff. This line in particular is genius:

    Once in Congress, Hayworth shed her Tea Party skin and joined the collective hiss of the Republican leadership, notably slithering with House Majority Leader Eric Cantor.

  • http://www.facebook.com/christopher.pawelski Christopher Pawelski

    I don’t know who you are Greco, but well put!

    I have been doing volunteer public policy advocacy in behalf of the farming community of Orange County for 16 years, working with elected officials on the local, state and federal level on both sides of the aisle. I have never, ever, ever dealt with someone so duplicitous, deceitful, dismal and dreadful as her.

    For a full accounting of how terrible she was to the farming community, despite her bs campaign rhetoric, read this thread and all the links in it:

    http://www.facebook.com/NY18CivilDiscussionCenter/posts/523476857680057

    It wasn’t just the disaster aid (see this article in particular about that: http://chroniclenewspaper.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20120620%2FOPINION03%2F120629992%2F)

    But it was E-Verify and labor, animal agriculture, etc ….

    Then during the second debate with Maloney she smeared me, claiming I was a “Democrat activist.” You see in her mind the only reason someone would have a problem with her is because they are partisan, not because she sucked. (link here, fast forward to the 11 minute mark: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4kNEvEU-0g&feature=youtu.be) Of course she lying tried to portray herself as such a “bipartisan moderate” but that seemed to get thrown out the window whenever she was confronted and challenged.

    What people don’t know, because I kept this fairly private, was back in August her Congressional Spokesperson Terence Michos, in a clear case of prohibited campaigning, sent a smear filled e-mail out to Orange County reporters and a group of my farmer contacts and friends, attacking, smearing and lying about me. The e-mail barely mentioned Maloney. It was a disturbing tactic and act that backfired on Hayworth. And it was something that neither Hayworth nor her campaign ever apologized for. That was though indicative of her and her personal integrity.

    I have a long record of working with everyone and never putting party ahead of public policy. As one of my friends has commented, “the only party you’re for is the ‘Chris party,’ the party that helps out the farmers the most.”

    This person not only was simply not helpful, she hurt farmers, on multiple levels and occasions. Good riddance to her.

  • http://twitter.com/amerigus amerigus

    I think the bigger question was why she was elected in the first place in 2010. We know there was low turn out, and as Peg admits, a lot who don’t follow the races too closely. But it may have been the Tea Party enthusiasm, buoyed by secret money and astroturf. Hayworth’s “Citizens United” surrogates spent liberally without identifying themselves then and now.

    This time around, we saw the same thing, but it was even more systematized – the Koch-fueled operation Americans for Tax Reform bought messages that simply plugged Maloney’s name into a generic negative ad that had a fictional couple complaining about raising taxes on small businesses. In case you weren’t aware, Koch Industries is a very, very large business.

    These things take years, but I hope voters finally figured out that dark money is suspicious. That there are reasons SuperPACs do NOT have addresses or websites. The interesting line in this ad brings up a much larger issue concerning the national Tea Party and the question of whether they were exploited, used and then discarded.

  • Aaron

    Nobody smeared Chris Pawelski. It was information about activities that many in the press said they already knew about, which is why so few media (and other farmers for that matter) attended his orchestrated press conference with congressional-elect Maloney.

    Any apology might well have been given by Chris to other farmers he hurt by his behavior. He might want to know that many, many farmers let it be known to the Hayworth campaign that Mr. Pawelski did not speak for them and they were sorry he would not even try and work with the congresswoman when she offered to reach out. She is a fine person who lost an election because of huge turnout in the cities of Newburgh, Poughkeepsie and Middletown: municipalities that were not in the 19th district.

    Many republicans lost, which will not be the case in the next election. Just like in 2009, 2010 and 2011 after Democrats did well in 2008. Expect a long written response from Mr. Pawelski, but “Me (and many who know him) thinks he doth protest too much”… He seems incapable of being gracious even in victory. That is a clear indication of a person’s character.

  • Aaron

    Nobody smeared Chris Pawelski. It was information about activities that many in the press said they already knew about, which is why so few media (and other farmers for that matter) attended his orchestrated press conference with congressional-elect Maloney.

    Any apology might well have been given by Chris to other farmers he hurt by his behavior. He might want to know that many, many farmers let it be known to the Hayworth campaign that Mr. Pawelski did not speak for them and they were sorry he would not even try and work with the congresswoman when she offered to reach out. She is a fine person who lost an election because of huge turnout in the cities of Newburgh, Poughkeepsie and Middletown: municipalities that were not in the 19th district.

    Many republicans lost, which will not be the case in the next election. Just like in 2009, 2010 and 2011 after Democrats did well in 2008. Expect a long written response from Mr. Pawelski, but “Me (and many who know him) thinks he doth protest too much”… He seems incapable of being gracious even in victory. That is a clear indication of a person’s character.

  • http://www.facebook.com/christopher.pawelski Christopher Pawelski

    Oh Aaron, whoever you are, you are full of crap. And since you challenge my honesty I will post first the Michos e-mail sent out, and then my reply below it, and everyone can judge for themselves.

    And let me state this I had a number of people on that list that received the Michos e-mail who reached out to me and say how disturbed and turned off they were by it, including one of Hayworth’s few diehard fans.

    The event, as you will see in my reply, was not “orchestrated” by me. Folks, that’s a flat out lie. I merely passed the info along. Events “orchestrated” by me are held on my farm, and I clearly detail the fact that it is.

    I never claimed to speak in behalf of all the farmers, but I do claim to fight in their behalf. And I fought for things that Hayworth didn’t, disaster aid, funding to dig the Wallkill, against E-Verify. Oh, Hayworth lied about these issues and her positions regarding them later, but the facts were clearly evident where she stood when it counted and what she did and didn’t do. Read the first linked thread above for all of the facts and details, which I clearly provide. Unlike the anonymous “Aaron,” who says crapola in hiding.

    And speaking in behalf of someone who wouldn’t concede on election night, who lied consistently about her record and on a number of issues and never did fire Jay Townsend nor take responsibility for his crude comment or fully apologize for it has little grounds to call me ungracious nor question my character.

  • http://www.facebook.com/christopher.pawelski Christopher Pawelski

    Here below is the Michos e-mail:

    —— Forwarded Message
    From: Terence Michos
    Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:54:18 -0400
    To: Terence Michos
    Subject: Nan Hayworth’s farm record

    Hello Friends-
    I don’t know Chris Pawelski but I received this email (at end of page)from a number of members of the farm community and some press. They were concerned that the information in the email sent to you by Mr. Pawelski was not factual and felt you might want documentation / information to show the efforts Congresswoman Hayworth has, and continues to make , on behalf of Orange County Farmers and other farmers throughout the 19th Congressional District
    Here are a couple of points to consider before you decide whether to embrace this spectacle.
    1- This so-called press conference was set up for Mr. Maloney by Chris Pawelski. Mr. Pawelski has been seen walking Sean Maloney around to meet people throughout the district.

    2- Mr. Pawelsi writes to you in a manner intended to portray himself as a caring non-partisan person who just cares for his farmer friends when , in fact, he is a regular participant in a 19th district website that says awful things about Congresswoman Hayworth on issues way beyond the scope of farm issues.

    3- Mr. Pawelski has written letters to the Journal news vilifying the congresswoman on issues outside the farm realm because he is highly partisan despite his claims to the contrary.

    4- Congressman Gibson, who Mr. Pawelski applauds, will acknowledge Congresswoman Hayworth’s support on behalf of farmers because she has co-sponsored Gibson’s farm bills. You just have to call him.

    5- The New York Farm Bureau has supported the congresswoman when Mr. Pawelski has made , knowingly, false claims about her farm support.

    6- When the NYFB supported her record , Mr. Pawelski vilified the NYFB and called them supporters of the republican party.

    7- The Democratic Senate Farm Bill must be reconciled with a Republican House Bill and the house will, almost surely, stay republican. Nan is in best position to get farmers what they need because they will heed her words. Sean Maloney will have no influence on any Farm Legislation.

    8- Sean Maloney has never lived in the district and still spends almost all his time in Manhattan. He has gotten his farm information from Chris Pawelski. My guess is he will have no interest in the farmers of Orange County if he loses the race where congresswoman Hayworth will support the farmers and people of this district she has lived in for almost 25 years whether she wins or loses the election.

    I will send more documentation concerning this subject. I hope you will look at it.

    1. Attached are letters the Congresswoman sent to USDA and others after the hurricane and tropical storm requesting disaster assistance specifically for farmers. These letters cover both requests for disaster declarations and additional funding. The letters are from both the Congresswoman alone and with her colleagues in the New York delegation. Two letters request the declaration by USDA; one letter is to FEMA and USDA requesting farmers be allowed to retroactively enroll in the non-insured crop disaster assistance program; and one letter is to the House appropriators requesting additional disaster assistance funding for farmers.

    2. The Congresswoman is cosponsoring several pieces of legislation to address storm damage to farmers:

    a. H.R. 2856 – Rep. Chris Gibson, legislation to provide assistance for agricultural producers adversely affected by damaging weather and other conditions relating to Hurricane Irene.

    b. H.R. 2905 – Rep. Chris Gibson, legislation to temporarily waive the risk management purchase requirement for agricultural producers adversely impacted by Hurricane Irene or Tropical Storm Lee so that such producers are eligible to receive assistance under the Supplemental Revenue Assistance Program (SURE), Emergency Assistance for Livestock, Honey Bees, and Farm-Raised Fish Program (ELAP), and Tree Assistance Program (TAP).

    3. Many of the specialty crops in the Hudson Valley are not adequately covered by existing federal crop insurance. As a result, damage from the storms were not adequately covered. The Congresswoman has been advocating for crop insurance reform in the farm bill. An attached letter to the drafters of the farm bill outlines her concerns.

    Sincerely,

    Terence Michos

  • http://www.facebook.com/christopher.pawelski Christopher Pawelski

    And here is my response:

    From: Chris Pawelski

    Date: August 28, 2012 1:51:45 PM EDT

    To:

    Subject: Fwd: Nan Hayworth’s farm record

    Okay, everyone on my list got this e-mail (see below) from Terence Michos yesterday, as well as a series of additional e-mails. Many of you forwarded them to me, asking, “who the heck is this guy?” Terence Michos is Rep. Hayworth’s Congressional Spokesperson. As such, he should not have sent these series of e-mails out because they are related to a campaign event and in his position he is not supposed to engage in ANY campaigning, because he is paid by our tax dollars. So what he did is a big no-no! But, that’s a discussion for another time. His other claim to fame is that he played the character “Vermin” in the Walter Hill directed classic film “The Warriors!” (see: http://www.fringeunderground.com/thewarriors.html)

    Well, Vermin’s e-mail contained a great deal of misinformation regarding Hayworth’s record and quite a smear of me. Please allow me to address these issues briefly.

    First, regarding Hayworth’s record, here are the facts, we were utterly destroyed last year at the worst time. What we needed was a ad-hoc crop loss program like what was passed in the 90′s and early 2000′s. Sen. Schumer & Gillibrand fought for it on the Senate side and Rep. Gibson, Owens, Hinchey and most of the NY Congressional delegation fought for it on the House side. But, it was blocked by House leadership and Rep. Hayworth supported that position. Period. There was nothing Schumer or Gillibrand could do because according to the U.S. Constitution all appropriations must start on the House side. Now, Chris Gibson is a Republican and he courageously went against his leadership to fight for this program. Other Republicans in the delegation did as well, but not Hayworth. My Chronicle letter details this (http://chroniclenewspaper.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120620/OPINION03/120629992/).

    Now, Vermin in his e-mails lists all sorts of things Hayworth co-sponsored and signed on to, after she backed Cantor’s “No FEMA funding unless offsets are found position” of course, and she took that public relations beating, but as you and I in the black dirt know those programs don’t apply to us, we didn’t get a dime from them, so whoopity friggen doo! We needed the crop loss program. All I got last year was my measly crop insurance payment, and I believe $4K for ditching, which went to my ditch digging contractors, so a net payment to me of ZERO! I lost $150K. So all of those things Vermin listed is merely misdirection for the public and press to cover Hayworth’s tail in that she didn’t fight for what we really needed, which was the crop loss program. Period!

    In regards to the river, which Vermin never mentions, again, Hayworth has been totally AWOL. Last year under her tenure she saw 3 “50 year floods” within 7 months. Last December the Congress rolled all the major funding measures together and this spending included $1.7 billion for EMERGENCY Army Corps spending … if 3 “50 year floods” within 7 months isn’t an emergency I don’t know what is. She could have gone to her leadership and said “I need $40 million of that carved out for my Wallkill River and district” and she didn’t even try. Her excuses don’t wash, the non-federal match can come in the forms of engineering or digging. Further, the state later, via State Sen. John Bonacic and Assemblywoman Annie Rabbitt did deliver $2 million for flood control in the black dirt. Once again to emphasize, she didn’t even try. These are facts.

    When she first ran for office she said she would not fight for appropriations or earmarks (I can e-mail anyone a series of questions answered by her & Rep. Hall for O.C. Farm Bureau where she clearly states this, just e-mail me and ask and I will e-mail it to you). She has stuck by that, so I was not surprised she did not fight for the ad-hoc crop loss program or funding to dig the Wallkill. She said she wouldn’t do it.

    Now, Vermin in his e-mail said of me, “Mr. Pawelsi writes to you in a manner intended to portray himself as a caring non-partisan person who just cares for his farmer friends when , in fact, he is a regular participant in a 19thdistrict website that says awful things about Congresswoman Hayworth on issues way beyond the scope of farm issues.”

    Well, for 16 years Eve and I have worked as unpaid advocates in behalf of farmers in the black dirt and beyond. We have worked on such issues as disaster aid, crop insurance, labor, conservation issues, the Farm Bill, amongst others. No one has paid us. I have sacrificed time from the farm and my family to do what I do. In many cases without appreciation or thanks. Eve and I were primarily responsible for working on the $10 million appropriation. We spent close to 5 years of our lives on that. I can’t tell you the number of calls, e-mails, letters, faxes, visits to the Hill, etc …. In regards to crop insurance, these are the changes to teh onion policy we are responsible for:

    1. A pilot program for “no stages option” for NYS producers
    2. A quality adjustment factor for adjusting losses
    3. A dramatically improved replant feature
    4. The development of a new system to determine the established market price for determining the MPCI price for onions (which is now very accurate)

    Now, these changes have put a lot of money in people’s pockets both via the crop insurance program and via the disaster aid program, on which the models for it are based.

    I have contacted Sen. Schumer, Gillibrand and Owens and Gibson’s offices regarding the recent push for drought aid. I have pushed them to fight to include our flood losses in any such aid and those offices are in fact fighting for that. Hayworth, to the best of my knowledge, is not fighting for that. Again, it goes against her core principles. But Schumer, Gillibrand and Owens and Gibson happily agreed to fight for that. Vilsack also lowered the em loan rates from 3.75% to 2.5% and those offices are fighting to make that retrocative. Again, Hayworth is not a player in that fight.

    No one has worked more on the farmworker bill over the years. I think if you were to ask Rev. Witt who is his arch enemy he would name me. I turned his org in to the Lobby Commission and derailed their lobby day years ago, ruining their momentum. No one has written more op-eds or contacted and worked with more legislators on that issue than me. Tell me, how would your farm survive if you had to pay ot? And by the way, most of those legislators are Republicans.

    And I don’t care about political party. I care about issues and getting the job done. Now, I have gotten both Sean Patrick Maloney and Nan Hayworth to state, publicly, in the press, that they will fight for disaster aid, and getting the river dug. I have successfully manipulated Nan Hayworth to state something in the press that in the past she would never support. I played her. Again, I don’t give a crap about political party, I want disaster aid for last year and the river dug, period. I have worked with both Republicans and Democrats over the years and will continue to do so. Now, I think Sean Maloney is sincere in what he stated because his past record supports what he is saying. Hayworth’s does not. In this Mid_Hudson News piece today Hayworth completely and totally lies and takes credit for something that Tom Pahucki did. She totally lies. Shame on her (http://www.midhudsonnews.com/News/2012/August/28/Maloney_blackdirt-28Aug12.html).

    I have recently forced a meeting with Vilda Mayuga at CCE, the woman at the NYSDOL responsible for getting rid of Glen and Patrick and dismantling the old Rural Rep program. At that meeting she said, and I quote, NY Farm Bureau supports me and what I am doing regarding these changes.” NYFB has totally rolled over. I am fighting this, not just for me obviously, but for growers locally and across the state. For those that attended the meeting they can attest I put a good stick up her rear end. That’s Democrat Gov. Cuomo’s appointee. But that’s kind of “partisan” I am.

    In his e-mail Vermin states:

    “This so-called press conference was set up for Mr. Maloney by Chris Pawelski. Mr. Pawelski has been seen walking Sean Maloney around to meet people throughout the district.”

    That is flat out untrue. I did not set it up. I merely forwarded the press release and invited people to attend and I showed up. Events that I set up are very clear. I make that crystal clear and there is no question of that. Past events include Sen. Gillibrand’s Farm Bill event, or Sen. Schumer visiting my farm last Labor Day. I clearly state when I set such an event up.

    Once again, I work with whoever is in office, both sides of the aisle, happily. Now, I honestly admit I don’t like Nan Hayworth. I don’t like her, not because she is a Republican. I love Republicans as much as like Democrats that help out farmers, like Annie Rabbitt and Chris Gibson and John Bonacic and Cliff Crouch, amongst many others. I don’t like her because she does not fight for us when it counts, and she lies, over and over again. She and her operatives are despicable people. I have been doing public policy work for 16 years and I have never dealt with someone like her and her crew. Ever. This e-mail by Vermin is just one example. It is disturbing. But, not surprising, considering who he works for and what I have experienced from her and her operatives previously. She lied about e-verify, she has lied about working with her dem Senate colleagues, and I can go on and on and on ……

    She has done squat about crop insurance. Read my Chronicle letter for the details. I don’t want to repeat all of it but 3 members of the NY Congressional delegation sit on the respective ag committees and I am friends with the head of RMA and no one has told me about any substantive efforts by her regarding crop insurance. It is pure crapola. Again, read my Chronicle letter for the details.

    My door has always been open for people to visit or call me with any problem, anytime, and over the years many people have. And Eve and I have worked on many personal problems and issues for growers as well, no problems, happily. I hate having to toot my horn, but I find this smear by this douchebag operative of Hayworth’s to be so offensive and appalling it requires a response. I have sacrificed, unpaid, time on my farm and time with my family to work on these issues over the years. I have no regrets but I strongly resent what this person says in this e-mail. I’m not running for Congress, Maloney is, why is Vermin attacking me?

    To the person or persons that forwarded my e-mail to Hayworth’s office, I wonder if after you received Vermin’s e-mail below if you sent him and/or Hayworth an e-mail pointing out how Eve and I have expended so much time and energy and effort over the years working in behalf of growers, maybe even helping you with a personal matter? Maybe telling them how much money you have received over the years thanks to our efforts. If you did, thank you.

    If you didn’t, if you put partisan politics ahead of sticking up for your neighbor and friend, something I would never do, then shame on you.

    Chris

  • http://www.facebook.com/christopher.pawelski Christopher Pawelski

    I have to add one more thing … I can’t tell you how many Republican elected officials and operatives who told me privately how terrible Hayworth was and/or how they hoped she would lose. A ton! And they weren’t “yessing” me, for they would provide details and examples of how and why she was terrible and they viewed her as such. Yes, in public, they would stand with her and claim to support her, but privately they would detail how bad she was.

    I doubt very few Republicans in the district shed many tears the night she lost, especially those that are in government and could have used someone sitting in the Congressional seat who would have fought to deliver stuff for their municipalities and the district during the time she occupied the seat.

    You are in a fantasy world in you think otherwise, anon.

  • topjob66t

    Anon is quite appropriate since this individual has smoke and vapor for a profile.
    I suspect that you will not be getting any reply since three days have already passed with nary a retort.
    The comment about ‘Newburgh’ and ‘Middletown’ being the deciding factor to the delightful demise of the POS Hayworth are the same dog whistle crap the Fox News and Limbaughs are spreading. You know … those ‘urban’ districts. Bigotry rings a bit from such statements. I’m from New Hampton and when I voted, at 10:00 AM I encountered a line of six people before me. In 38 years I never had a line. So it was turnout across the region everywhere that got rid of the useless Hayworth and elected Maloney. And to this day I still miss Rep. Hall. That guy was all over the Washington DC trying to get things going and happening for our district. He was a pro when presiding over the House members during roll/vote calls. C-Span allowed me to see that happen a couple of times. While on the other hand all I ever saw of Hayworth was hanging around Cantor or Boener for a photo op.
    You should be able to work quite well with Maloney and I am sure he will act in kind since you appear to be a valuable ally to anyone who works to help you get things done. Good Luck,
    TJ Creed

  • topjob66t

    Anon is quite appropriate since this individual has smoke and vapor for a profile.
    I suspect that you will not be getting any reply since three days have already passed with nary a retort.
    The comment about ‘Newburgh’ and ‘Middletown’ being the deciding factor to the delightful demise of the POS Hayworth are the same dog whistle crap the Fox News and Limbaughs are spreading. You know … those ‘urban’ districts. Bigotry rings a bit from such statements. I’m from New Hampton and when I voted, at 10:00 AM I encountered a line of six people before me. In 38 years I never had a line. So it was turnout across the region everywhere that got rid of the useless Hayworth and elected Maloney. And to this day I still miss Rep. Hall. That guy was all over the Washington DC trying to get things going and happening for our district. He was a pro when presiding over the House members during roll/vote calls. C-Span allowed me to see that happen a couple of times. While on the other hand all I ever saw of Hayworth was hanging around Cantor or Boener for a photo op.
    You should be able to work quite well with Maloney and I am sure he will act in kind since you appear to be a valuable ally to anyone who works to help you get things done. Good Luck,
    TJ Creed

  • topjob66t

    Beautiful description. That is a copy and paste into my running Word political scrap book.

  • topjob66t

    I enjoyed reading this article. All the hard work to get out the vote and inform people of what Nan Hayworth was about and what she was NOT about paid off. AltNY has been a valuable source for info on our side of the aisle. Thanks.

  • http://www.facebook.com/christopher.pawelski Christopher Pawelski

    Well put TJ! Thank you!!!!!!

    As I have said in other message boards, after the Maloney event at the Jeff & Adina Bialas farm both Maloney & Hayworth said in press accounts they were for digging the River and fighting for a crop loss program. I believe Maloney 100% that he will fight for those things because his background and previous govt. experiences tell me that’s what he is used to doing and working on.

    Hayworth, on the other hand, I didn’t believe for a nano-second because the entire time she occupied the seat prior she did not fight for those things and either actively supported positions to block it or was happily passive and didn’t lift a finger to help. She had no credibility at all.

    Later she actually lied and claimed she did fight for the crop loss program. I don’t know who she thought she was dealing with but there was no way I was going to let that lie stand. She also lied bigtime when she claimed credit for getting the trees cleared out of the river north of the Pellets Island Bridge. Total lie, for that was Tom Pahucki’s doing, 100%! She tried to take credit for what he did in regards to the removal of the DEC objections in connection with the Endangered Species Act. Totally outrageous lie on her part. For shame!!!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/christopher.pawelski Christopher Pawelski

    And very true about Rep. Hall. He was an amazing advocate for farmers and had a great staff which were awesome to work with. He and they really tried and did a great job. Hayworth wasn’t even a shadow of him. As I have posted frequently, she didn’t have a single tangible accomplishment in behalf of the district. What a dismal Rep. she was.

  • topjob66t

    Funny you mention Bialas. Their son Jerry lives down my block on a dead end street. Because he is a neighbor I never got into any of the fights he and the town or county got into with him. He gave up the paving business a couple years back but not before he did a dismal job on my own driveway. But we still wave to each other congenially and get along okay.
    I am retired and maybe, somehow in the future, I might be able to be of assistance in your efforts to make things better. I am so glad to see you writing and giving opinion here. And yes we both spend more time elsewhere as far as this site goes. I have a number of haunts where I chat away and not without impunity at a few.
    Thanks for the reply! I am honored.

  • topjob66t

    Funny you mention Bialas. Their son Jerry lives down my block on a dead end street. Because he is a neighbor I never got into any of the fights he and the town or county got into with him. He gave up the paving business a couple years back but not before he did a dismal job on my own driveway. But we still wave to each other congenially and get along okay.
    I am retired and maybe, somehow in the future, I might be able to be of assistance in your efforts to make things better. I am so glad to see you writing and giving opinion here. And yes we both spend more time elsewhere as far as this site goes. I have a number of haunts where I chat away and not without impunity at a few.
    Thanks for the reply! I am honored.

  • topjob66t

    He had the friendliest staff I ever had to deal with! They made sure I had the information I needed to settle whatever was on my mind. I rarely have that much on my mind that I call my congressman. But they loaded me up with stuff to answer my questions.
    The one time I called Hayworth the phone just rang and rang.

  • http://www.facebook.com/christopher.pawelski Christopher Pawelski

    The honor is mine and would love to be able to work with you!

  • http://www.facebook.com/christopher.pawelski Christopher Pawelski

    The honor is mine and would love to be able to work with you!

  • Truther

    One of her biggest mistakes was to be photographed with TeaBagger nutcase and former Carmel High School bully and dropout John A. Greene. Greene, the owner of “Doc’s Nutrition Depot” in Carmel and Mt. Kisco, which sells the dangerous stimulant/steroid “DMAA” (see NIH & FDA warnings on this substance, and the fact that the U.S. military banned it after soldiers died from heart attacks after taking it), has a long sordid history well known to residents of Carmel. Robert Castelli also lost his race after being photographed with these thugs.

  • Pingback: Car Recovery Edinburgh



Environment


Switch to our mobile site