Romney’s plan to ‘cut the nuts off’ an Obama second term revealed

11/04/2012
By
Mitt Romney

What’s Mitt Romney thinking?

A New York GOP fundraiser told a past Romney campaign donor in a phone call that “Mitt has a plan should he not win the electoral vote,” according to the donor.

“We think we can make a compelling case to the American people,” she reportedly said. The fundraiser then said “we’ll throw everything we can in the way” of a second term for President Barack Obama.

The donor asked if this was the strategy of the Romney campaign, the fundraiser replied that she “got it directly” from people working for the former Massachusetts governor.

NYaltnews will not reveal the name of the past donor or the fundraiser, according to the donor’s wishes.

The donor works as an officer at a Wall Street private equity firm, and has donated to Republican, Independence, and Democratic Party candidates for New York City Mayor, and New York Governor, State Senate, Assembly, and Congressional races in the past. He was a 2008 McCain supporter in addition to supporting Mitt Romney in the 2012 Republican primary season. He informs us he is not supporting Mitt Romney in Tuesday’s election, however.

The phone call was reportedly made for a banking-industry PAC that is supportive of Romney, not the Romney campaign. The donor who contacted NYaltnews says the fundraiser had previously contacted him on behalf of the Romney campaign, as well as the campaigns of two New York Republican members of Congress in the past year.

The Electoral College is widely considered an artifact, and was considered effective in times when three or four political parties dominated the political landscape and campaigning was often conducted regionally, with cross-country campaigning not yet workable. However, the Obama campaign strategy is to win the electoral vote by waging a swing-state strategy to complement larger “safe” Democratic states such as New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Michigan, and California.

Curiously, Romney has began airing commercials and ramped up campaigning in states not considered battlegrounds such as Pennsylvania and Oregon. Some political observers say this is being done to gather stray undecided voters in these states and increase the chance and margin of a popular-vote victory.

There is also speculation that Romney may apply a strategy reportedly considered by George W. Bush’s campaign in 2000 if he lost the electoral vote to Vice President Al Gore, but won the popular vote–the opposite of what actually happened in the election.

Romney may be preparing a set of talking points that the Electoral College is essentially unfair and back this argument with a massive Fox News and talk-radio blitz that would fuel doubt in the legitimacy of an Obama win. The goal is to turn public sentiment against President Obama with a message that the President’s campaign thwarted the majority of the people. It is has also been speculated on the Democratic-leaning blog, DailyKos, that Romney might be the first presidential-race loser to refuse to concede the election.

A strategy to make a second-term for Obama appear illegitimate would also use prominent business leaders who will be urged to lobby their customers and clients, prominent members of clergy who will speak to their flocks about “the will of man,” and even a fake grassroots movement of Democrats speaking out against the Electoral College result. In fact, Bush’s campaign advisers in 2000 contemplated creating a “Democrats for Democracy” group to make this point, if necessary.

Some polls now suggest that Romney is in the lead with the national popular vote, but most polls in swing states are suggesting an almost impossible path to the 270 electoral votes he needs to be elected. Nate Silver of The New York Times FiveThirtyEight blog runs against the speculation of a Electoral College/popular vote split. He now projects Barack Obama to win 306 electoral votes and win  50.6 percent of the popular vote.

No incumbent president seeking a second term has ever won the electoral college and lost the popular vote. And a win in the electoral college for Barack Obama that is not accompanied by one in the popular vote could cast a shadow over the president and his ability to govern. Republicans have already been fussing about perceived voter fraud to this end, but a popular-vote victory for Romney will further support this cause.

“This is the point she was trying to make,” said the donor who declined to give to the PAC. “I don’t think they want to steal the election by saying ‘the popular vote should be counted instead of the electoral vote,’ I think they want to cut the nuts off a second term for Obama.”

  • Alexander H.

    I think this shows why it is important to vote in this election. Every vote counts even if you live in New York, which is blue they need those votes to tally up to a popular vote majority so Romney can’t whine about this. I think this is critical.

  • Alexander H.

    I think this shows why it is important to vote in this election. Every vote counts even if you live in New York, which is blue they need those votes to tally up to a popular vote majority so Romney can’t whine about this. I think this is critical.

  • Bakke

    While I don’t typically trust articles that use anonymous sources, this scenario sounds entirely plausible.

  • HFD

    I think this IS the way Mitt should go, and I think that they’ve got to use whatever they have in their power to stop Obama from destroying this country with a second term. But I think Romney is going to win a landslide, so I don’t even know why this is even being speculated.

  • http://twitter.com/amerigus amerigus

    Romney would be seen as a sour grapes whiner if he tried this – we’ve had a split in the popular/electoral vote in our lifetime and moved on – but there is no doubt the “billionaire set” plans to de-legitimitze Obama regardless, because they have already fueled his opposition candidate to the tune of over a billion dollars.

    Many don’t know of veiled threats made recently by casino magnates Steve Wynn and Sheldon Adelson, vowing they would “do business differently” if Obama wins. These threats were publicized by talk radio hosts to scare voters into lining up behind these rich bosses, in conjunction with emails uncovered urging employees of the Kochs and other large employers to vote in their bosses’ interests.

    Rest assured rich people do NOT create jobs, demand for goods and services creates jobs. So the damage billionaires could do in the wake of an Obama win, for example, shipping their jobs overseas (these casino owners already have in reality) will be short-term class warfare attacks that hurt their domestic operations in the long term.

    In terms of the need for the electoral college, it was no less than Conservative George Will who reminded us the most important reason to preserve the current system. In the case of a close election, the recount process, sometimes bitterly fought, is sequestered by state.

    With no electoral college in a close race, we could potentially have hundreds or thousands of individual precincts all across the country calling for recounts which would plunge the country into chaos.

  • http://twitter.com/amerigus amerigus

    Romney would be seen as a sour grapes whiner if he tried this – we’ve had a split in the popular/electoral vote in our lifetime and moved on – but there is no doubt the “billionaire set” plans to de-legitimitze Obama regardless, because they have already fueled his opposition candidate to the tune of over a billion dollars.

    Many don’t know of veiled threats made recently by casino magnates Steve Wynn and Sheldon Adelson, vowing they would “do business differently” if Obama wins. These threats were publicized by talk radio hosts to scare voters into lining up behind these rich bosses, in conjunction with emails uncovered urging employees of the Kochs and other large employers to vote in their bosses’ interests.

    Rest assured rich people do NOT create jobs, demand for goods and services creates jobs. So the damage billionaires could do in the wake of an Obama win, for example, shipping their jobs overseas (these casino owners already have in reality) will be short-term class warfare attacks that hurt their domestic operations in the long term.

    In terms of the need for the electoral college, it was no less than Conservative George Will who reminded us the most important reason to preserve the current system. In the case of a close election, the recount process, sometimes bitterly fought, is sequestered by state.

    With no electoral college in a close race, we could potentially have hundreds or thousands of individual precincts all across the country calling for recounts which would plunge the country into chaos.

  • http://twitter.com/amerigus amerigus

    Romney would be seen as a sour grapes whiner if he tried this – we’ve had a split in the popular/electoral vote in our lifetime and moved on – but there is no doubt the “billionaire set” plans to de-legitimitze Obama regardless, because they have already fueled his opposition candidate to the tune of over a billion dollars.

    Many don’t know of veiled threats made recently by casino magnates Steve Wynn and Sheldon Adelson, vowing they would “do business differently” if Obama wins. These threats were publicized by talk radio hosts to scare voters into lining up behind these rich bosses, in conjunction with emails uncovered urging employees of the Kochs and other large employers to vote in their bosses’ interests.

    Rest assured rich people do NOT create jobs, demand for goods and services creates jobs. So the damage billionaires could do in the wake of an Obama win, for example, shipping their jobs overseas (these casino owners already have in reality) will be short-term class warfare attacks that hurt their domestic operations in the long term.

    In terms of the need for the electoral college, it was no less than Conservative George Will who reminded us the most important reason to preserve the current system. In the case of a close election, the recount process, sometimes bitterly fought, is sequestered by state.

    With no electoral college in a close race, we could potentially have hundreds or thousands of individual precincts all across the country calling for recounts which would plunge the country into chaos.

  • http://twitter.com/amerigus amerigus

    Would you say the ‘destruction’ of the USA that happened in the last four years was worse than the destruction that happened in the economic crisis of October of 2008 or the national security crisis begun on September 11, 2001?

  • Pingback: Balloon Juice » Blog Archive » Down to the Nut Cutting

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Alan-Alexander/502988241 Alan Alexander

    The danger posed to this nation by rogue states and terrorism is insignificant next to the danger posed by psychotic freaks like you.

  • http://twitter.com/wetcasements James

    George W. Bush started two needless wars and gave Paris Hilton a tax cut after losing a popular vote.

    So anyone saying Obama “doesn’t have a mandate” can, I dunno, go fuck themselves.

  • JetfireK

    Tell us what Romney’s platform is? Oh that’s right, he isn’t going to tell until he is the President. Soooooo we’ll never get to hear it or know…..and that includes you!

  • JetfireK

    Very good point! ThANKS

  • SamR

    Meh. Romney wants to be President. If he loses the EC, he doesn’t win the Presidency. I doubt he cares how effective Obama is during his 2nd term, unless he can somehow convince himself that he can be re-nominated in 2016. I don’t know many Dems who were interested in re-nominating Gore in 2004, though I suppose the GOP may behave differently.

  • SamR

    Meh. Romney wants to be President. If he loses the EC, he doesn’t win the Presidency. I doubt he cares how effective Obama is during his 2nd term, unless he can somehow convince himself that he can be re-nominated in 2016. I don’t know many Dems who were interested in re-nominating Gore in 2004, though I suppose the GOP may behave differently.

  • SamR

    Meh. Romney wants to be President. If he loses the EC, he doesn’t win the Presidency. I doubt he cares how effective Obama is during his 2nd term, unless he can somehow convince himself that he can be re-nominated in 2016. I don’t know many Dems who were interested in re-nominating Gore in 2004, though I suppose the GOP may behave differently.

  • http://nyaltnews.com/ Cliff Weathers

    There are some questions regarding the sourcing of this post from visitors from Reddit and from Balloon Juice. My source, “the donor” is a person I have used as a source to for a previous story; I know him to be reliable (the story was later picked up by the MSM). He does not wish that his name be used because he’s concerned that it can harm his career with his Wall Street company. In other words, my source leads a double life–personally and politically. As far as the fundraiser is concerned, I am familiar with her and know that this is something that she is entirely capable of saying. Typically, I wait for secondary sourcing, but I was without power from Hurricane Sandy for five days and had to make the call whether to run with the timely story as a “blind item”, or to let it sit. My choice was to get the info out there and weather any criticism.

  • Pingback: Links 11/6/12 | Mike the Mad Biologist

  • Pingback: News Wire | COMMENTARY: Warfare waged by the upper class – Kennebec Journal

  • Pingback: News Wire | Warfare waged by the upper class – Washington Post



Environment


Switch to our mobile site